Skip to content

Add role-based access control#8384

Merged
WilliamBZA merged 4 commits into
masterfrom
docs-rbac-servicecontrol-servicepulse
Jul 7, 2026
Merged

Add role-based access control#8384
WilliamBZA merged 4 commits into
masterfrom
docs-rbac-servicecontrol-servicepulse

Conversation

@ramonsmits

@ramonsmits ramonsmits commented Jul 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Adds RBAC documentation for ServiceControl PR #5518 (6.18.0) and
ServicePulse PR #3049 (2.9.0):

- New ServiceControl authorization guide covering the permission model,
  built-in roles (reader/admin/writer), reading roles per identity
  provider, enabling authorization, and the authorization audit log
- New ServicePulse authorization page covering permission-gated UI and
  the 'Your permissions' page
- New Authentication.RoleBasedAuthorizationEnabled, RolesClaim,
  SubjectIdClaim and SubjectNameClaim settings on all three instances
- Cross-links from security overviews and authentication pages
- Menu entries under both security sections
Remove the permission-key model and manifest/routing plumbing that is
not relevant to configuring an identity provider. Add a step-by-step
'How to enable role-based access control' section covering the required
SC/SP versions, config keys, and IdP role setup.
@ramonsmits ramonsmits requested review from WilliamBZA and dvdstelt July 1, 2026 09:40
Comment thread servicecontrol/security/configuration/authorization.md Outdated
Comment thread servicecontrol/security/configuration/authorization.md
Comment thread servicecontrol/security/configuration/authorization.md Outdated
Comment thread servicecontrol/security/configuration/authorization.md
@WilliamBZA WilliamBZA marked this pull request as ready for review July 7, 2026 08:28
Co-authored-by: Dennis van der Stelt <dvdstelt@gmail.com>
@WilliamBZA WilliamBZA merged commit 2394b4d into master Jul 7, 2026
4 checks passed
@WilliamBZA WilliamBZA deleted the docs-rbac-servicecontrol-servicepulse branch July 7, 2026 09:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants